this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
92 points (97.9% liked)
Games
32734 readers
2917 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
For me the biggest hurdle in these types of games are when I'm hit with the 'completionist' bug. I want to check every corner of the map, finish all the side quests - often burns me out before I can finish the actual story.
I feel the same. What does it even mean to finish a game anymore? There are so many things to explore, so many tiny tasks to accomplish. Did you have fun while you were playing? Do you want to start playing something else? Sounds like you finished the game.
That's how I think about it anyway.
This phenomenon has pushed me into more “railroaded” or “theme park ride” games recently. It Takes Two and Hi-Fi Rush really shepherd you along the story path. You can poke around the room you’re in, but compared to more open world games, it’s much easier to keep yourself pointed toward the next story point.
I can still have fun with open world games, but I think I appreciate smaller ones more.
Long term I'm going to have much better memories of the 30 hours I put into Sable than I am the 200 or whatever it is of TotK.
Seriously, people should try sable. It's like a toned down botw in the desert without combat. Such a super chill game with an interesting world.
Yes, same here. I have the last mission (I think, "Meet Hannako at Embers") in Cyberpunk still to do and I pick it up and do a handful of side quests every few months. Maybe I'll finish it, eventually.
Same, that often keeps me from finishing open world games
oh yeah 100%. I get super into collecting all the little knick-knacks, realize how boring it is, and give up the whole game. Including Zelda, sorry not sorry
Yeah same here. I have found myself playing almost entirely sandbox games these last few years. Where there isn't really and end goal (or at least one I'm not required to complete) and I just get to build something or manage resources, etc.
That’s also my case, open-world games that are actually open-world. Mostly Minecraft. And I’ve tried FPS games, they’re too hard for me and I die too much in them. (And in most of them these days the “meta” changes every 3 milliseconds so strategy is impossible)
That, and online chess, though I have ADHD so I’m restricted to the really long time controls like 15 minutes with 10-second increment and therefore stand no chance against 90% of players I meet IRL and friend on chess.com since nobody wants to play anything longer than blitz these days and they always insist on 3 minutes unless I randomly challenge some complete stranger who often doesn’t even live in my home country. Of the many 3-minute “blitz” games I’ve embarrassed myself in, both online and IRL, only in like 5 did I last more than 15 moves, only in 3 did I not lose on time and and only in one did I actually win.
This is exactly where I'm at with spiderman ps4. I cleared out the map but never finished the story, now if I go back I will be nowhere near as good as I used to be, so it remains unfinished