this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2023
42 points (88.9% liked)
Asklemmy
43786 readers
959 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Facedeer started the conversation, while loudly proclaiming that he doesn't want to. What's wrong with pointing out that he's the one engaging?
Homie admits that he doesn't know anything about communism, but says his issue is with how Lemmygrad is not communist. Their issue is with ML communism.
Nope. I don't care whether they're communist or not, they're apologists for authoritarians. The communism thing is just an excuse they dress that up in.
You said previously:
I was challenging your implied assertion that LG isn't communist, or that currently existing socialist countries aren't communist.
(For clarity, I'm using the terms "socialist", "communist" and "Marxist-leninist" mostly interchangeably. That tends to be the practice in ML spaces, I'm happy to expand on that if it's helpful).
It doesn't seem like you've got the knowledge base to argue whether or not a country like China or the DPRK is or isn't socialist. If you want to argue that they're bad because they're authoritarian, that's fine by me.
Can you help me understand what you mean by "authoritarian" and how it doesn't apply to Western/liberal democracies?
It's my understanding that every state uses authority to force some level of compliance at some expense to personal freedom (i.e. giving me a ticket for making graffiti is authoritarian).
I don't agree that every state's use of authority is a bad thing.