this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
122 points (86.3% liked)

conservative

1257 readers
981 users here now

A community to satirize conservtive and right-wing "ideals".

This community (now) exists as a pressure valve, a place to process through humor the often frustrating world of conservative politics. Above all, this is NOT the place for serious conservative support/viewpoints/arguments. There are other places on Lemmy for that if you desire it.

Rules:

  1. Always follow .world instance rules

  2. Parody With Purpose: This is a space for humorous takes on conservative politics. We welcome satire, but draw the line at content that promotes racism, sexism, homophobia, or other forms of bigotry.

  3. Memes Over Manifestos: This community focuses on humor and parody, not serious political debate. There are plenty of spaces for earnest conservative discussion, this isn’t one of them.

  4. Highlight Contradictions: Sometimes the best content points out inconsistencies and hypocrisies in conservative talking points. Creative commentary is encouraged.

  5. Public Figures Fair Game: Politicians and pundits can be satirized, but no targeting of private individuals, doxxing, or harassment.

Children of public figures under the age of 14 are also off-limits, a 16 year old has enough free agency to break with or adopt their parents views. An 8 year old kid doesn't.

  1. No News Zone: Memes only, news or other serious content should be sent to the nearest relevant comm. Meme's of current events, however, are encouraged.

  2. Clear Satire: Make your satirical intent reasonably clear. We’re here to mock bad ideas, not accidentally spread them. If you're unsure how it will be taken, feel free to DM the mod team ahead of time or explicitly tag it as satire in the body.

A note on ChadMcTruth: Chad's content is 100% satire, but his work can sometimes be hard to tell, but if he posted it be assured, its satire.

  1. Relevant Content: All posts should relate to conservative politics or ideologies in some way somewhere in your post. Either in the title or the meme itself.

For more general political memes please see [email protected]

  1. Community Respect: Disagree with fellow members all you want, but personal attacks aren’t welcome. Save the criticism for the ideas, not each other.

  2. Moderation Discretion: Mods will use reasonable judgment in applying these rules. We’ll be fair, but firm. These kinds of comms have a tendency to get off the rails, so we might seem overzealous in moderation sometimes.

  3. For the moment, i'm allowing properly tagged NSFW content as long as its funny and relevant. Don't make me regret it.

And above all, HAVE FUN!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
122
Chart (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by cm0002 to c/conservative
 

ETA:

For accuracy, the chart is old (2014) and references discretionary spending instead of mandatory which is where programs like SNAP (Food Stamps) generally fall

However, even accounting for all that properly, at the time of the meme, food stamps would have still been just 2% of the federal budget. Thus the spirit of the meme is still good.

https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/a/36521

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Is the chart accurate? Do we have a source?

I ask because I don't see where social security would fit at all, and I suspect that Medicare/Medicaid would be a larger portion than the 5% listed for health.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Is the chart accurate?

No. It's outdated, misleading and inaccurate.

Most people don't realize it but in FY2024 the interest payments on our national debt exceeded the entire military budget.

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/breaking-down-the-u-s-governments-2024-fiscal-year/

If you don't like that source then here's the treasury department itself: https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/americas-finance-guide/federal-spending/

[–] BombOmOm 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's blatantly dishonest for OP's chart to be labeled "Federal Spending" when it doesn't include the majority of federal spending categories. Particularly when the goal is for the reader to point at the largest spending category, despite the chart not including the largest spending categories.

[–] cm0002 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes and no, a reverse image search pulled up this answer on stack exchange https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/a/36521

It's old, and only represents discretionary spending vs mandatory (which is where food stamps/SS/Medi* would be) but according to them for food stamps specifically it would still only be about 2% of the federal budget

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Can you update the text part of the post with these details?

[–] CoCo_Goldstein 3 points 1 week ago

I believe food stamps are a subset of the US Department of Agriculture spending.

[–] Tyrangle 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Social security and Medicare are considered mandatory spending. The chart above is presumably showing discretionary spending, which is a subset of the overall budget. I can't speak to it's accuracy beyond that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

According to the comments of an earlier post of the same picture it is not: https://lemmy.world/post/25845711