this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
11 points (100.0% liked)

California

1563 readers
76 users here now

Welcome to /c/California, an online haven that brings to life the unrivaled diversity and vibrancy of California! This engaging community offers a virtual exploration of the Golden State, taking you from the stunning Pacific coastline to the rugged Sierra Nevada, and every town, city, and landmark in between. Discover California's world-class wineries, stunning national parks, innovative tech scene, robust agricultural heartland, and culturally diverse metropolises.

Discussions span a wide range of topics—from travel tips and restaurant recommendations to local politics and environmental issues. Whether you're a lifelong resident, a recent transplant, or planning your dream visit, /c/California is your one-stop place to share experiences, ask questions, and celebrate all the things that make California truly unique.

Related Communities:

Nearby Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

While it’s good to think things through without jumping to conclusions based on partisanship, this is very wrongheaded.

First, your assumption that the presidio is mainly used by local residents is not correct. It is the main viewing area for the Golden Gate Bridge, which is a major national and even international tourist attraction that is usually considered must-see for anyone visiting the city from elsewhere.

Secondly, you seem to be unaware that there are many smaller NPS properties all around the country that are not national parks or monuments, including national seashores, national historic parks, etc. The presidio’s status is far from unusual. It’s also fairly clear that this particular park is being targeted because of Trump’s animosity towards California and it’s residents.

Finally, even if you don’t think it makes sense for the NPS to be involved in this kind of thing, the president does not have the authority to decide this. The Presidio trust was created by congress and the executive branch was lawfully ordered to manage it. Eliminating it is a clear violation of the law and constitution as with his other unilateral cancellation of lawful programs. This is not just about the presidio, it’s a constitutional crisis. If the executive branch no longer obeys the other branches of government then it is not substantially different from a dictatorship, and this is far more important than whether or not the presidio is federally maintained.