Critics blasted President Donald Trump after he followed up a proposed Ukrainian "peace plan" — that essentially gives Russia one-sided concessions for nothing — with a speech from his private residence in Palm Beach in which he scolded Ukraine for starting the conflict.
“You’ve been there for three years. You should’ve ended it in three years. You should have never started it," said Trump.
"Fact: Russia invaded Ukraine, twice, in 2014 and 2022. President Trump is echoing a Russian talking point here," wrote CNN's Jim Sciutto on X.
"Trump once again blames Ukraine for starting the war. Trump blames Ukraine for invading Ukraine," wrote former Rep. Joe Walsh (R-IL), a one-time Tea Party activist turned conservative Never Trump crusader. "Sure, tell me Trump isn’t working for Putin. Tell me he’s not a Russian asset. Go ahead."
"Truly, it’s time for everyone to admit it, Trump is legitimately a Russian asset," wrote former Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL).
...
"TRUMP IS DISGUSTING!" wrote podcaster Ed Krassenstein. "He literally just claimed that Ukraine shouldn't have started this war. He's literally blaming Ukraine for starting the war & is taking Putin's side. How can MAGA still support this man? He's siding with a murderous dictator and spouting Russian lies."
...
"Trump claims Ukraine started the war — a total disgrace against everything America represents," wrote conservative attorney Heath Mayo. "Don’t be shocked — be motivated. And for damn sure do not bend the knee. Stiffen your spine and get ready to win back an America with a moral compass."
"Trump's team allegedly has offered Putin (1) Ukrainian territory, (2) no NATO membership for Ukraine, (3) no US soldiers in Ukraine, (4) the withdrawal of US soldiers from Europe, including from frontline states, and (5) sanctions relief," wrote former U.S. Ambassador to Russia and Stanford University political science professor Michael McFaul. "Putin's return offer -- nothing."
"Donald Trump is the President of the United States and the Spokesperson for Vladimir Putin," wrote Ed Davey, head of the British Liberal Democrats party. "Only we in the UK and Europe will protect Ukraine."
Right, that's all great, but after all the slamming, blasting and scorching, will there be ANY negative consequences for him? CAN there even be any negative consequences for him anymore?
Through all of this, the one thing people should have learned is that you can't shame a right wing Nazi.
"Putting them on blast" isn't going to do anything because meaningless and inconsequential words are their weapon of choice.
By all means express that you don't agree with what's been done. But don't anyone think for a second that strong words will have any impact on someone who couldn't give a fuck about what you have to say.
> reads a serious comment
> my brain:
– He-he, "Putin them on blast".