this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
761 points (99.1% liked)

tumblr

3707 readers
972 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fishos 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Any unit since pi is a ratio of radius to circumference(Ο€=C/𝒅). That's the point of the image - if you measured using circles, EVERYTHING would be a ratio of pi in some way you could discern.

[–] Opisek 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The post refers to d = C/Ο€ turning out to be an integer. Therefore, what unit did they measure C in?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why are you bringing the speed of light into this? Also, d is 6 inches.

[–] andros_rex 2 points 2 days ago

πŸ€“πŸ€«errmmm akshuallly speed of light is almost always lowercase c

[–] Opisek 2 points 2 days ago

Gave me a chuckle.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The circumference of some unit wheel. If you make a wheel that is 1 unit in diameter in any unit X that you please and measures things by placing a mark on the wheel where it touches ground at your start point and counting off full revolutions as you roll the wheel, stopping when that same mark is at the bottom then your measurements are always going to be countsize of X unitpi. If you do more than one such measurement in total then all of your measurements are going to be divisible by the size of unit X and pi. If there's any record of what unit X is (and if you engage in a lot of trade there just might be), then the whole thing becomes kind of obvious when someone converts to the lengths to your units and always gets a multiple of pi.

[–] Opisek 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, if the historians know what the unit is - obviously. My entire point was that the original "quote", if you can call it that, fails to address this.

[–] fishos 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, it does not say integer. It says "all the sides being divisible by pi" aka "a ratio of pi"

[–] Opisek -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That is not what divisibility commonly refers to. In the normal context, one number is divisible by another if the division yields an integer. 4 is said to be divisible by 2 but not by 3.

With your definition:

  • It would not make sense to say something is "perfectly" divisible. Duh, everything is divisible by everything except zero.

  • It would not be surprising that the length of the piramid is divisible by pi. Duh, everything is divisible by everything except zero.

  • The response to that statement would not need to mention circles at all. Duh, everything is divisible by everything except zero.

[–] fishos 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Look, if you don't understand math just say so.

[–] Opisek 0 points 1 day ago