this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
433 points (99.1% liked)

World News

41190 readers
3886 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Ukrainian officials were advised not to sign a U.S. proposal on accessing rare earth minerals, as it prioritized U.S. interests and lacked security guarantees for Ukraine, according to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

The document, presented by U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bassent during a Kyiv visit, was intended as compensation for U.S. aid.

Speaking at the Munich Security Conference, Zelenskyy stressed any agreement must ensure both financial benefits and security for Ukraine amid ongoing Russian aggression, and Ukraine is preparing a counter proposal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jhex 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And who is going to enforce a breach?

trump himself re-negotiated nafta and is now renegging on his own deal placing tariffs on Canada and Mexico

[–] khannie -4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

My first thought is that payments are staggered and if they don't arrive the contract ends. Bog standard clause. Wild man trump isn't going to risk American lives over enriching his mates. Americans wouldn't tolerate it either.

Having only local workers as part of the contract would also remove any boots on the ground to remove.

Second one that occurred is WTO.

[–] Jhex 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Wild man trump isn’t going to risk American lives over enriching his mates. Americans wouldn’t tolerate it either.

Surely you joke?

[–] khannie -5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

No I don't. What mother is going to happily send their child off to war over a contract?

[–] Jhex 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No sure about the happily part but pretty much every modern conflict has been over stealing resources or political posturing

[–] khannie 1 points 3 days ago

That last part I fully agree with but very obviously enriching already very rich people at the cost of your child's life (versus for example keeping oil prices low for the average Joe hidden behind a war of being the good guy aka gulf war 1).

I just don't see it happening. I can't see the average US soldier and especially their parents rallying around "they broke our contract!".

[–] kreskin 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean.... How many bags of onions are we talking here?

[–] khannie 2 points 3 days ago

One. Absolute best offer.

Ok, ok. One bag potatoes too.

Ladas only for early sign ups.