this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
59 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3835 readers
132 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Neither lowering fares or simply increasing enforcement can solve fare evasion alone. Investing in better services and winning public trust are just as important.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The income from the fines helps offset the cost of discounted travel.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But only if cost of en execution is low.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It took me a second to realise what you meant, but it's a very good point if I understand you correctly. Income from fares only offsets the cost of discounted travel if the wage of the people doing the enforcement (and any other overhead) is less than the amount brought in by that enforcement. Is that it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

I mean, if some person doesn't pay a fine in time, there is an additional cost to do a debt collection.
Some people has multiple fines to pay, so gains are probably lost forever.