Asklemmy

45156 readers

1188 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Do you have any rules you try to follow when engaging with others online? (sopuli.xyz)

submitted 5 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm curious what, if any, guidelines people self-impose to try and engage in a productive way online (both on Lemmy and elsewhere). "Netiquette" if you will.

A couple of rules that I think are good practices, but still see too often, are:

don't pile onto the most downvoted comment. Kinda like don't feed the trolls, but it's more about not letting yourself get rage baited. Instead, downvote them and move on.
don't give a non-answer to someone's question. Ex. if someone asks how to do X, don't answer with, "Why are you trying to do X? You shouldn't want to do X. Do Y instead." Instead, explain what it would take to do X, and then offer Y as a possible alternative and why it may be a better option. But assume they already know about Y, and it doesn't fit their use-case.

For that last one, finding a thread where someone has asked the exact question you want answered, only to find a thread full of upvoted non-answers is up there with the dreaded "nvm, I figured it out - 10y ago".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Downvotes are not for disagreements.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (5 children)

What are they for? Like/dislike?

[–] Anonymouse 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I saw somebody suggest that the voting buttons should be used to indicate whether the comment benefits the discussion or not.

I suppose the same would be true of the original post; does the post benefit the community.

For example, posting a blog of why Mitsubishi is the best car maker to a photography forum is a downvote, true or not. Posting that veganism isn't a sustainable lifestyle to a vegan sub is an upvote, but you'd better be ready for some backlash.

[–] Stovetop 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That veers into subjective territory, though. From your example, going to a vegan community and declaring that you don't believe veganism is sustainable would be seen by most as not contributing to discussion, but just trying to troll or incite a flame war. I'd consider that detrimental and downvote.

On the other hand, asking "How can we make vegan lifestyles more sustainable?" would be something worth upvoting.

Communities are not necessarily places where people go to debate or have deep discussions, often it's just to find solidarity and meme out with good vibes. I'm not going to go to the Elden Ring community and say "Elden Ring is trash", even if that's a valid opinion for someone to have, because that's not really the right place to have that kind of discussion.

[–] Anonymouse 1 points 2 days ago

Point taken. It was probably a bad example. I was trying to find an example of something that would be an unpopular topic rare hat would ultimately benefit the community.

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)