Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
No NSFW adult content
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
The OBS Studio open-source screencasting and streaming app has called out Fedora's poor Flatpak packaging of the application and is threatening as going as far as legal action if it isn't addressed.
Flathub in Discover app on Fedora KDE:
Kinda arrogant to host their own OBS Flatpak that doesn't work as it should and redirecting users to it when using the GUI.
And as they are a version behind in their own "Fedora Flatpaks" it now loops too:
There's probably more to the story as to why Fedora started their own flatpak repo in the first place. I can't imagine it was for shits and giggles. Anybody have insight into this?
Anti Commercial-AI license
It was due to there stance on non free software. The have since weakened that stance.
Because of Atomic right?
Some discussion here:
https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/463#comment-955522
https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/463#comment-955412
Basically OBS used an EOL Runtime as the newer version had regressions causing OBS to not work properly.