this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
470 points (99.2% liked)
science
15770 readers
199 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.
2024-11-11
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Sure, but that a long exposure will end up like a hummingbird is what I'm questioning
If it was real it would have been featured on the artists page at least no?
The aurora can display in a lot of ways. Often it looks like columns appearing then disappearing like dust catching sunbeams through the blinds. It's the same idea as taking a long exposure of a thunderstorm. The lightning didn't all happen at once.
Where someone posts an image can also depend on community preference and care given to posting in multiple communities.
Also odd to suspect something in a science community is less likely to be real than one in an art community but, all things being even, the skepticism is a bit healthier here i guess.
At the end of the day, this doesn't look unlike a real aurora and the time lapse is also evidenced by the brightly lit hilltop... ... And the stars. And bright unlit areas
It looks as much like a hummingbird as a cloud can look like an elephant. The viewer has already been prompted to see a hummingbird, and humans are very good at finding a pattern in something random. I can easily believe it to be real, but I'm not sold on the idea that it particularly resembles anything significant.