this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
100 points (83.8% liked)

Work Reform

10509 readers
209 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] okamiueru 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

These articles just stink corporate interests. "You'd have to pay 20% more than a competitor, if the difference is requiring not working from home." rings a lot different than "please master, don't make me go back, I'll work for 20% less and be happy, it's a win-win, right?"

Let's see how competitive the company is when you are off by at least 20% and the ones who work from home at the competing firms are more productive at it too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

These are total bullshit Corp articles. Another way to stifle pay. If your skillet is good for the job you should get paid that. The only benefit to working in the office is to get needlessly bagged at by walkby's. What's the point of walking to your home office, getting on a computer working, vs wasting unnecessary time in traffic creating pollution and walking to the office to get on a computer and work? It's stupid.