this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
34 points (82.7% liked)

movies

2185 readers
330 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

πŸ”Ž Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For fucks sake Disney? Too tight to pay a respectable artist?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's too many issues with the image. For example, why does the brown coat have buttons when it looks like a poncho?

[–] ch00f 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Most of these "issues" are terrible arguments:

  1. AI doesn't duplicate heads. That's kind of the whole point of AI. You know what does duplicate features? Lazy compositing.

  2. It's a retro-future movie. That's a retro-future outfit.

  3. and 9) Extras don't know how to use 70 year old props? This is surprising?

  4. We're going to call out grammar errors, but ignore the flawless pencil drawing of the logo on the other poster?

[–] ekZepp 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is a good argument. But they could simply have fixed the grammar errors in edit. That would also explain the cloned heads used to cover something else. Also, there are a couple of suspicious hands. Still, i'm not 100% sure.

Fantastic-Four-Poster

[–] ch00f 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's also possible that "We 4 You!" is the intended message. Like if it's that obvious, do you think the guy who had to add "prepare 4 launch" wouldn't have noticed it and fixed it? Clearly some post-processing happened here.

[–] EarMaster 2 points 21 hours ago

I read that as "We O(we) U" and to make it fit the theme they painted a 4 in the middle.