this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
69 points (91.6% liked)
Shows and TV
1075 readers
85 users here now
Open discussion of Media / Shows / Television
- Be nice
- Don't go off topic
- Don't rage farm
Other communities
We are still open to mod application, please comment on this post: https://lemm.ee/post/40675177
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As a Buffy fan I'm quite excited. But sarah michelle gellar is just not a drawcard for me. What's to be excited about? She played the least interesting character and did a mostly adequate job of it.
She is 47, she was 25 when Buffy ended.
She needs to be a mentor and train a new slayer.
I watched for Willow, Giles, Cordelia and Spike.
Angel was better sans Buffy.
Buffy got boring because they leaned into the child soldier and she just gave up trying to have any kind of normalcy in her life.
Then again its been nearly a decade so I could be misremembering.
I thought that from S5, after her mom and then she died, that it was the best part of the series. It stopped being as campy and showed much more character growth all around.
I used to joke that spike should vamp faith, then together they kill buffy and rename the show: Faith and Spike, the Vampires.
I'd be into that show for sure. Or Spike turns Faith and Buffy and they go off as a triad. Always thought Spike and Faith were better for Buffy than Angel.
Faith and Spike were the much cooler bearded-evil-dimension versions of Buffy and Angel, for sure.