this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
401 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19890 readers
4982 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nightwingdragon 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

The least that they could do is take responsibility for their actions but, I don’t see that happening.

That's never going to happen. They'll just downvote you to feel better about themselves.

Take a look at my post history, including in this very thread. Despite repeatedly asking, I have never had a single one of these morons ever actually answer the question of how allowing Trump to return to power was in any way better. The most they do is either downvote silently because they know they have no answer, or just tell me to go fuck myself.

And I don't expect to ever get an answer either. I'm going to keep asking because I think the downvotes are hilarious. But I don't actually ever expect to get a serious response.

[–] kreskin 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Despite repeatedly asking, I have never had a single one of these morons ever actually answer the question of how allowing Trump to return to power was in any way better.

Hello my partner in the democratic party, The floor is yours. Sprawl out on your belly and continue pounding the floor with both fists like the rest of your hostage taking ilk. If your side wanted to win, a win was in your grasp with a single announcement from Harris, she chose not to make that announcement. You never contest that point, why not? So yes we're here in the wilderness with you. Difference is, we progressives (whose votes you absolutely needed to win) have been here a while. Check out my camp chair and marshmallow stick, cool eh?

Say, what outcome are you hoping to achieve with this increaingly boring and pointless messaging ? Are you trying to get progressives to join a future genocide? I think history has shown pretty conclusively that thats not going to work. Anything else you need, party-brother?

I have a declaration of universal human rights that you might have never seen before, to pass the time. Or the works of Emmanuel Kant. Some stuff from MLK.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Well here's a serious answer: Allowing Trump to return to power is collateral damage, and really bad collateral damage but it was simply unacceptable to allow Harris to win the election with that mess of a platform. One would hope for a mass movement to resist Trump during or after election seasons, but American leftists are too spineless to do anything other than complain so the end result is... this mess.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

but American leftists are too spineless to do anything other than complain so the end result is… this mess.

Um, we've been doing far more than complaining... Who do you think is organizing on the ground right now, and have been for years? I mean, not like the Dems helped, or even moved out of the way of that organizing...

I mean, I really did enjoy getting tear gassed by Democratic party cops for daring to protest against police.

[–] Nightwingdragon 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well here’s a serious answer: Allowing Trump to return to power is collateral damage, and really bad collateral damage but it was simply unacceptable to allow Harris to win the election with that mess of a platform.

Explain how allowing Trump to return to power was better in any way. Pick something, anything that was so unacceptable that you couldn't vote for Harris and explain how allowing Trump to return to power was the better option. Pick multiple things if you want.

You don't stop shooting yourself in the foot by pointing the gun at your head instead.

One would hope for a mass movement to resist Trump during or after election seasons

So your plan was to allow him to return to power and just hope to be able to resist later? You didn't think this thing through very well, did you?

but American leftists are too spineless to do anything other than complain so the end result is… this mess.

And exactly what do you expect them to do now that you've stripped them from all power at every level of government? And wouldn't it have been easier to just hold your nose, vote for Harris, and prevent this situation from occurring in the first place?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

So first I'm not American, so I didn't do anything, but that aside:

Explain how allowing Trump to return to power was better in any way. Pick something, anything that was so unacceptable that you couldn't vote for Harris and explain how allowing Trump to return to power was the better option. Pick multiple things if you want.

The GOP is obviously a lost cause, but the DNC doesn't have to be. Allowing the DNC to succeed in the election after their attempt to shift to the right again would set the precedent that they can do whatever the fuck they want and people will still vote for them. Then your two options become the fascist GOP or the now actively harmful DNC, and there's nowhere that can lead other than GOP fascism. Between the choice of Trump now or JD Vance in 8 years, Trump now is the better choice if it will allow you to avoid JD Vance in 8 years. Which leads to my other point:

So your plan was to allow him to return to power and just hope to be able to resist later? You didn't think this thing through very well, did you?

The ideal scenario would be mass Democrat protests (and other direct action such as strikes if and when protesting fails) when the DNC nominated Harris without a primary that would lead to the nomination of a competent candidate or at least a better platform for Harris than the monstrosity she ran with. I mean Republicans in her cabinet? Border wall? Just yikes. Anyway the American public chose to stay silent here. The less ideal but still workable scenario would be a Democrat mass movement riding the wave of Abandon Harris and the Uncommitted movement to, again, force the DNC to relent on their unpopular platform. The American public either stayed silent or actively ridiculed these movements, telling them to "hold your nose and vote for her". From that point onward there was no happy ending and the only thing to be done was damage control. With that in mind let's think about how the damage could be controlled: One way would be, as you said, to vote for Harris and try to avoid the current situation. That allows you to bet on Trump dying or being convicted before 2028, but in the case he wasn't he was 100% going to win in 2028 because Harris's platform put to action was going to piss off everyone to the left of Dick Cheney, and her being a black woman would piss off everyone to the right of Dick Cheney. Also, even if Trump was out of the picture before 2028 you'd run the risk of the GOP nominee being an actual good politician riding the Trumpist wave to destroy the country worse than Trump—who is fundamentally limited by being dumber than a sack of potatoes— ever could. Standing in the face of all this would be a DNC that learned from their 2024 victory that being outwardly rightwing corporate stooges works. The short of it is: The problem with a Harris 2024 victory was that nothing Harris was going to do in her term was going to prevent a Trump/Trump clone from winning 2028. "Let's cross that bridge when we get to it" doesn't work when American leftists have proven time and time again that they don't know how to cross bridges. The other option is... well, you're living it right now. Again, nothing is going to happen without a mass movement against Trumpism and for progressive economic policy so if nobody does anything (which seems to be the case) y'all are toast but that was going to be the case no matter who won the 2024 election.

And exactly what do you expect them to do now that you've stripped them from all power at every level of government?

The DNC isn't leftist, just to make that clear. By leftists I mean actual American people with leftist values, and as for what they can do... well, there are many things but you can ask the French or the Spanish. Spaniards went on a general strike in October where

they called the country to come to a complete halt until the government breaks its diplomatic relations with Israel, as well as its commercial and military ties that include a weapons trade valued at over one billion euros.

Now I'm not talking about solidarity with Palestine here, but this is one way to make your government do something it doesn't want to do. So why are we not hearing of Americans going on strike to stop the Trump government from ruining the country?

And wouldn't it have been easier to just hold your nose, vote for Harris, and prevent this situation from occurring in the first place?

See above.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

how allowing Trump to return to power was in any way better

How was arresting your voters for protesting genocide helping keep Trump out of power?