this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
210 points (93.4% liked)

PieFed Meta

170 readers
423 users here now

Discuss PieFed project direction, provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics.

Wiki

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Check out #GlobalSwitchDay on Mastodon - https://mastodon.social/tags/GlobalSwitchDay

... and consider boosting this post - https://mastodon.nzoss.nz/@rimu/113926058602986146

https://piefed.social

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Seems like an asshole/ego move to fork Lemmy rather than contribute to it when Lemmy is an ongoing project

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

It's an entirely different codebase. Lemmy is written in Rust, PieFed in Python. If you're a Python developer you're not going to randomly learn Rust to contribute to the huge existing codebase that is Lemmy, and even if you did you might have a different stance than the Lemmy developers calling for a fork.

Furthermore, it's not a zero sum game. The projects share content, and both benefit from the success of the other.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

It's not a fork.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Ignoring the fact piefed isn’t a lemmy fork.

Are you really going to argue that forking an existing project because you want to take it a different way is an asshole move?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Also ignoring the same fact.

I mean in a way they're not wrong. This open source fragmentation is an actual nightmare at this point...

Buuuuut considering who the lemmy devs are I will gladly move to Piefed when I can actually easily host my own instance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Open source is all about fragmentation. It's a natural result of freedom.

Sure, if everybody pulled the same direction on the same project and successfully coordinated their cooperative effort while agreeing on everything and also having the perfect™ vision for the project, that would be great.

But that's just not gonna happen, for a million reasons. So instead, we get diversity, and people can use the software that fits them, and develop what they're interested in in the language of their choosing. Thank god.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Yes, it is generally good, but if we want a viable alternative to the sub-based AI platform, then we need more users, not more platforms.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I wouldn't be here if I had to use Lemmy. Its user experience doesn't appeal to me.

Piefed appeals to me, so I'm here. More good options will be reflected in more users.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

The platforms are federated and use the same protocol, it doesn’t matter

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago

Normally I'd agree, but the recent increase in popularity of Pixelfed among the TikTok crowd has shown me that it's possible for one fediverse platform to succeed where a competing one failed.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Why did you assume it's a lemmy fork?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Anything to avoid those dirty commie tankies. Lol

[–] [email protected] 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm fine with it whilst there are maintainers with the whole "transgenderism is bourgeoise decadence" stance going on. I've happily worked with MLs and MLMs, I'm not a fan of bigots who work backwards to fit their ideology to their prejudices.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 minutes ago* (last edited 14 minutes ago)

MLs = Marxist Leninists

MLMs = Multi Level Marketing (schemes)?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Only if its still compatible, otherwise no. Not "anything"