this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
408 points (99.5% liked)
Curated Tumblr
4159 readers
8 users here now
For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.
The best transcribed post each week will be pinned and receive a random bitmap of a trophy superimposed with the author's username and a personalized message. Here are some OCR tools to assist you in your endeavors:
-
FOSS Android Recs per u/[email protected]: 1 , 2
Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I mean sort-of but not. Matrotrophy evolved independently, so there is no relationship between the "smaller, mobile gametophyte" in plants and the "small mobile gamete" in animals. It's just coincidence/ convergence.
And we know that it absolutely is coincident/ convergence, because in the evolutionary ancestors of vascular plants, its the haploid phase that form large bodies, and the diploid phase that analogous to sperm/pollen and eggs/megasporangia.
So like, mosses, green algae, red algae. They do things very differently than vascular plants.
I won't argue the point further than this message, and I appreciate the details you've provided, but the point of analogies is drawing parallels to quickly aid understanding at a surface level.
Nothing analogous to finding a needle in a haystack actually involves rooting through dry grass for a sliver of metal, but the analogy still stands.
The limits of metaphor are when they do more to disguise than to explain.
We shouldn't confuse things that can be difficult or require significant study to understand or explain with convenient but wrong stories.
If a metaphor fails the first test, than we shouldn't use it.
I agree - but parallels can be a quick and effective way to communicate information where the specifics aren't important, even if they have to be consciously discarded for someone diving further into the detail.