this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
217 points (98.7% liked)

World News

40091 readers
3001 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

German lawmakers are debating whether to pursue a ban on the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), but many fear the move could backfire ahead of the Feb. 23 national election.

The proposal, backed by 124 lawmakers, seeks a court review of whether the AfD is unconstitutional.

Critics, including Chancellor Olaf Scholz, warn a failed attempt could strengthen the party, which is polling at 20%.

The debate underscores concerns over the AfD’s extremism but also the risks of fueling its anti-establishment narrative.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid 64 points 3 days ago (3 children)

"I just can't decide whether or not to get rid of the Nazis. It's not like anything bad happened before..."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

And as we all remember, when the Nazi Party was banned 100 years ago, the problem was solved, just like that, and nothing at all happened afterwards.

[–] FlyingSquid 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was solved for decades. Sorry it wasn't solved for an infinity number of years like you think it should have been.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm talking about the Beer Hall Putsch. Not the end of WW2, as that would 80 years ago.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Okay, and the Nazi party got outlawed after WWII and things seemed to do well for most of those 80 years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Do you think that was because of the ban on the NSDAP or because of the unconditional surrender, execution of influential personnel and subsequent occupation of Germany?

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 12 hours ago

I think that there were no Nazis left to run the party by the 1980s and Germany was still fine.

[–] Klear 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not like anything bad happened last time Germany started banning political parties...

I mean, I would ban them in a heartbeat, but I get their caution.

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 1 day ago

What was the difference last time? I'm sure you know.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Didn't you know that there's very fine people on both sides?

[–] FlyingSquid 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I thought most Germans disagreed with that, but apparently not enough.

[–] SoftestSapphic 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 2 days ago

I guess German schools did not try hard enough teaching kids history.