Seattle

1618 readers

247 users here now

A community for news and discussion of Seattle, Washington and the surrounding area

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Seattle to vote on funding for social housing (developing housing that would be cost-controlled and owned by taxpayers) (www.seattletimes.com)

submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/seattle

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

On ballots that went out last week, voters have two choices to make to determine the future of Seattle’s newest plan for housing.

The first is whether the developer should be funded at all. The next choice — regardless of the previous answer — is how.

Option 1A is with a new employer tax on all salaries over $1 million a year. Backers hope the 5% tax would raise as much as $50 million a year to be spent on buying and, eventually, developing housing that would be cost-controlled and owned by taxpayers.

Option 1B is to fund the developer with $10 million a year in existing city funding — specifically the city’s JumpStart tax on large corporations in Seattle.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Tujio 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let's go, Seattle. Put our money where our mouths are. Tax the rich to help the poor, invest in infrastructure, be a sanctuary to the needy, all the good shit.

As a lower-upper-lower-middle-class DINK, I am more than willing to give up some more tax money to help. People making more than 10x what I do should feel the fucking same.

[–] DougHolland 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Harrell and the current Council aren't going to do anything like that.

[–] Tujio 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Agreed, and the appointment of Mark Solomon kind of solidifies that. I'm hoping that we pass 1A, and by the time we actually get to work on it we'll have voted in a council that actually does the shit we want.

[–] DougHolland 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'm mystified by all these 'centrist' officials in our fine liberal city. Is it because the only newspaper is acres to the right of its readers, along with KOMO and KIRO and who knows about the rest...

[–] Tujio 1 points 37 minutes ago

That's a big chunk of it, yes. KOMO is owned by Sinclair media, KIRO isn't much better. Fox13 is fucking fox, so I won't even bother. The Times is Hearst Corporation. So the vast majority of media sources here are directly owned by institutions that have a vested interest in maintaining status quo.

The Stranger is still independent, but the quality has suffered greatly over the last 10+ years.

Also, this is partly a natural pendulum swing back to the right. A lot of people were upset after the Sawant experiment (debacle?), but instead of finding better leftist politicians, we just fled back to the centrist, corporate bullshit that led us down the Sawant path in the first place.