this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
29 points (73.0% liked)
Israeli Crimes
158 readers
2 users here now
All Israeli crimes, past and present. The Israeli genocide of Gaza has a historical context behind it.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Here's the UN report:
https://news.un.org/en/sites/news.un.org.en/files/atoms/files/Mission_report_of_SRSG_SVC_to_Israel-oWB_29Jan_14_feb_2024.pdf
Sorry. Israel's galaxy of crimes does not automatically excuse Hamas for their own human rights violations.
Where's the evidence?
None of the following is evidence:
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2024-04-18/ty-article-magazine/witnesses-confessions-naked-dead-bodies-all-the-evidence-of-hamas-rape-on-oct-7/0000018e-f114-d92e-abfe-f77f7e3f0000
Meanwhile we have plenty of evidence of Palestinians being raped, including a video, and Israeli politicians and religious leaders arguing that it is okay to rape Palestinian prisoners.
https://forward.com/fast-forward/344783/israel-army-rabbi-once-justified-rape-of-non-jewish-women/
Edit: I wonder if due to federation issues my edit citing Haaretz isn't showing..?
You're welcome to take that all as credible, or not. They talk about not wanting to expose particular alleged victims they interviewed to media scrutiny, for obvious reasons, and also about some alleged victims or actions that they found not to be credible when they investigated further.
Absolutely true. The two don't cancel each other out. Like I said, Israel's much greater galaxy of crimes doesn't mean that Hamas is automatically innocent of everything.
Hearsay isn't evidence though and nothing has been substantiated. Hamas militants weren't the only ones in the jailbreak, there were other militants and groups and likely there were some Israeli plants too.
Hearsay is a problem because you can't examine the actual source of the claim. A professional team interviewing the witnesses directly, and then trying to verify the stories, and then writing down their findings, is not hearsay.
The report talks about non-Hamas civilians being part of the attack, and say that there is no way to know which individual it was that committed any particular act of sexual assault. Maybe that means that I shouldn't say "Hamas" is responsible for the violence. To me, that doesn't suddenly make the indications of sexual assault by the people who executed the attack suddenly evaporate.
"Israeli plants," to me, is fantasy. The Israeli government clearly allowed the attack to happen to further their own goals in Palestine, yes, and you can blame them for that (along with the backdrop of fifty years of oppression and genocide). What's your source for there being Israeli plants as part of the attack?
Israel has gangs and agents in the Gaza Strip, it is not a secret. Plus professional teams can be lied to. I cited Haaretz reporting that nothing was ever substantiated, and no physical evidence of sexual assault found on any of the bodies.
Anyways arguing this is pointless. All we know for certain that Hamas didn't commit any sexual violence and doesn't have a policy of committing sexual violence. Whether any other Palestinian group might have and whether that group is an Israeli plant can be debated forever.
My main concern is Hamas which is the elected government of Palestine. Proof of their innocence from this claim, is in how the prisoners were treated all this time, versus how Israel treated Palestinian prisoners with actually documented cases of rape, and rape as a policy promoted from the religious and political establishments, and publicly defended in Israeli media.
I'm not trying to debate it with you, no, so I'll leave it alone. I think I've said what I wanted to say at this point.
According to your argument it cannot be Hamas because there were other militants and Israeli plants, so it has to be one of them. So even if there are proven rapes, you first, according to you, you have to show the involved were part of Hamas and not a plant or other militants.
It sounds like a slippery slope because for the rape victim, the burden of proof is now placed on their shoulders. For most people if Hamas unleashed chaos on the 7th of October, and even Israeli plants used the chaos to rape everyone in their way, from the victims point of view, Hamas released the chaos and they were raped because of that. If Hamas feels like it is totally innocent of all rapes, they should identify all the rapists since then and prove they were other militants or Israeli plants. But that burden should not fall on the victims of the offence.
Same goes for the other side, if you laid siege to an area and the innocent got hurt, the burden should not fall on the victims to prove it wasn't Israeli forces, but on the instigating party.
Did you purposefully ignore that no one found any evidence of it? I cited Haaretz, Haaretz is not Palestinian and doesn't speak for Hamas. It is an Israeli newspaper and one of the fairer in their coverage despite the inherent bias. On the other end we have plenty of evidence of Israelis raping Palestinians, bragging about it and publicly defending it.
I think the issue for most in the West they are still stuck in the mindset of Hamas being evil and are willing to believe any accusation despite how flimsy and unsubstantiated it is.
Not all of us here on Lemmy is West, infact my country is probably going to pay the price with US sanctions for taking Israel to the ICC. So please do not make assumptions where an audience is from on a globally available social network.
But as South African, where our previous President raped someone, we saw all the narratives to dispelling the victim.
I never said Hamas raped anyone, even if there is evidence it will never convince everyone and visa versa even if ther is no rapes even you must know that not everyone will believe it, I was just commenting on your argument that there were other militants and Israeli and basically insinuating that if there were rapes you first have to prove it wasn't one of these parties. I feel such an argument is already defensive if you are so certain there wasn't any rapes from Hamas's side, which I am still saying I have not accused Hamas of committing, I am not a witness nor am I deeply involved to be the arbitrator.
Take some time and read this, there is a chance my last comment and edit wasn't showing on some instances due to federation issues:
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2024-04-18/ty-article-magazine/witnesses-confessions-naked-dead-bodies-all-the-evidence-of-hamas-rape-on-oct-7/0000018e-f114-d92e-abfe-f77f7e3f0000
choice quotes from the article:
[emphasis mine]