"In other words, vote suppression cost Kamala Harris no less than 3,565,000 votes. Harris would have topped Trump’s official total by 1.2 million. Most important, this 2.3% suppression factor undoubtedly cost Harris the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia. If not for the wholesale attack on votes and voters, Harris would have won the election with 286 Electoral votes."

You could consider re-posting the information as a new thread.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Liberal Qanon

[–] banshee 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't really know what this is supposed to mean, but I assume it's some kind of silly quip.

Regardless, I'm not arguing for the article - just thought it was interesting.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 days ago

That's ok, normal people will be able to tell what I mean