Ask Science
Ask a science question, get a science answer.
Community Rules
Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.
Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.
Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.
Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.
Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.
Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.
Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.
Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.
Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.
Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.
Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.
Rule 7: Report violations.
Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.
Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.
Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.
Rule 9: Source required for answers.
Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.
By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.
We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.
view the rest of the comments
I asked this some months ago. The consensus seemed to be the they merge and become one. But I can't get passed the feeling that the two centres of mass becoming one and the same gives us some sort of info about what happens behind the combined event horizon, which seems wrong. So if that's not what happens then perhaps the two black holes only appear merged, but actually they're just very close, and from our view they're perpetually falling toward each other slowed by relativistic effects?
I'd love to watch an actual scientist tackle this question. Without an answer from a professional there isn't an answer.
FWIW the Wikipedia page on the first detection a few times quotes the research papers that they do "merge". A process whose completeness seems emphasised by the subsequently detected ripples that decay to nothing which they call the "ringdown".
But yes, explanation by a professional would be fantastic
That's pretty cool.
Supposedly tomorrow all the planets are going to line up at night. If you enjoy science and stuff look up for that.
Very good. The problem is that singularities are quantum objects. Quantum physics works nothing like classical physics.
For example, in the case of perpetually falling singularities, would they just quantum tunnel into each other? Or would singularities even exist? According to general relativity, singularities are a sphere that never stops being compressed due to its own gravity. What happens when this sphere hits a diameter smaller than Plank's length? Does the universe take a screenshot? The point is, we have absolutely no clue about what's happening here.
To understand the above, we would first need to understand how gravity works at the quantum level, which we don't. Why? Gravity is incredibly weak. Studying it is thus, very hard.
One could say the same for the mass of each of the black holes as well from the start of their collapse, and anything else they've ingested. They are still falling into their singularity point, forever.