this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
478 points (99.0% liked)
Funny: Home of the Haha
5952 readers
1032 users here now
Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
-
/c/[email protected] - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/[email protected] - General memes
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think you need an active usb c to dvi-d to get thisnto work. Unfortunately ive not come across this need before but i have looked into it and it would seem the only options to get the full resolution and refresh rate of dual link dvi is woth an active usb c to dual link dvi cable OR with a usb c to displayport cable then a display port to dual link dvi cable
If usb c is the source the above should help.
If dual link dvi is the source then you need to make sure that the usbc end supports display port alt mode. Otherwise it the same as above. Dvi to dp to usbc.
But this is all info i just read and may be wrong, and you also canr account for cheap converters lying about what they support.
Yeh I figured it needed to be active, couldn't find any and the ones that claimed (and ultimately turned out to be lying) to be dual link weren't active so unsurprising they didn't work.
That's a very interesting idea about the double conversion with displayport though, I never thought of that. Are the displayport to DVI dual link cables easier to get or are they unicorns as well?
We used displayport to dvi all the time in that job. Both dvi i and dvi d