this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
365 points (98.7% liked)

AnarchyChess

5316 readers
187 users here now

Holy hell

Other chess communities:
[email protected]
[email protected]

Matrix space

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

https://handbook.fide.com/chapter/E012023 3.7.3.3 No.

It'd be an extreme edge case where not promoting would be useful.

[–] Cort 6 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Pawn can't capture sideways, how would it ever be useful?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Forcing stalemate if you're super down in material

[–] Mr_Fish 6 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe if any promotion would lead to a stalemate

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

If your opponent plays strictly by a point system, like a computer might, and if the piece is threatened, it might be beneficial to keep the value low to trick the oppont to do something else, while you keep the useless pawn as an obstruction, which could somehow limit your opponent's future moves.

Anyway, it's apparantly not allowed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Well exactly. I can't think of one. It could only be useful in a situation where having a dead weight in a cell would solve some problem or other, but I've no idea how.