Showerthoughts

30498 readers

171 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted, clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts: 1

Rules

All posts must be showerthoughts
The entire showerthought must be in the title
No politics
- If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
- A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
- If you feel strongly that you want politics back, please volunteer as a mod.
Posts must be original/unique
Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

vatlark

forkball

Thekingoflorda

-44

Blocking users, while good for your own mental health, is the surest way to enable their echo chambers. (self.showerthoughts)

submitted 2 weeks ago by JeeBaiChow to c/showerthoughts

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Think about it: you try reasoning with them, then get tired and block their noise from your feed, but all that does is reduces the presence of the 'readonable minority', allowing them to spew their rethoric to a more receptive audience. Socmed sucks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Ugh. This old argument again.

If you'll remember, that's how social media used to work. If you are old enough to remember OG Facebook, back when it required a .edu email address to sign up (and for a brief while after it was opened to the public), you only saw posts, and other people only saw your posts, if you both accepted friend requests. No randos were spewing nonsense in your feed; if Becky or Brandon started spewing conspiracy theories, you just un-friend them and they're gone from your digital life.

It was just a place for people you already know to connect online and maybe meet some friends-of-friends in the process. The feed ("wall" I think it was called?) was reverse chronological and nothing was boosted or demoted; likes only indicated you liked it.

That model seemed to work pretty damn well by not allowing toxic people, bad actors, conspiracy nuts (unless your friends were all conspiracy nuts), and dis-/misinformation to permeate every freaking interaction.