this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
23 points (100.0% liked)
Factorio
1136 readers
6 users here now
A Lemmy community for the game Factorio made by Wube Software.
Rules
- Be a good person
- Content must relate to Factorio
- Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
In computing this sort of a problem would generally be solved by tagging via packet metadata - wouldn't it be simpler to reserve a portion of the signal for a recipient address for signal decoding?
That would be way easier. I'm a dumb.
I am a dev in my professional life - the number of times I've used that reply to feedback is innumerable (I literally used it on Wednesday in reply to a proposed solution to mitigating replication lag).
Realizing you did a dumb thing is part of the game of life. Now you've finished building one awesome system and can probably refactor it to an even awesomer system!
Woo! Same! I'm working on a bit packing solution ATM. Should be more UPS friendly and more resource friendly :D
I think I was leaning into the clock method as it doesn't have an upper/lower limit to circuit values or number of distinct circuits. Actually as I'm typing this I realized concurrent signals would have to share a 32 bit address space greatly limiting the min/max values. Two channels already limits me to 2^16-1 assuming I want a signed value.