Fuck Cars
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
view the rest of the comments
Pedestrians do have the right of way, specially on the sidewalk. It doesn't matter if you think it's a jerk move. A pedestrian crashing into another person also can't do anywhere near the damage someone on a bike can. By your same stupid logic, cyclists shouldn't use the road because they hold up traffic.
Sorry if it wasn't clear, my logic was never "cyclists should be able to bully pedestrians because cyclists are faster"
My logic is: It takes like 10 second for an pedestrian to step to the side, let 10 bikes pass, and then move again like nothing happened. Or literally no time at all if they just don't take up the whole sidewalk and the bikes can pass safely. The cyclist in general also wants to have a safety gap to the pedestrian because a crash is just as dangerous to both parties. That is entirely different to bikes on the road, which need a minute and a lot of energy do accelerate again, and if a crash happens, only the cyclist is in danger, so drivers can get sloppy.
And it does matter that I think it's a jerkish move, because all I saw in your comment was "sometimes, cyclists are assholes". If there is anything more there, let me know, because I can't see anything else in your anecdote.
I specifically avoided, not only calling cyclists assholes, but calling the people in my story cyclists. It also takes like 10 seconds for a cyclist to get off of the cycling path to allow a line of 10 cars that have invaded it to pass. That's entirely not the point. If a cyclist is aware that they should keep their distance from a pedestrian, then they wouldn't be on the sidewalk or they would get off the bike and push it, which is what the law says. There's no ifs or buts. Giving motorcycles to people who don't understand that and calling them "ebikes" will just endanger everyone.