this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
118 points (98.4% liked)

World News

39643 readers
2092 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The UK government is considering tighter rules on MPs earning substantial incomes from media contracts, following scrutiny of figures like Jacob Rees-Mogg and Nigel Farage, who made six-figure sums as GB News presenters.

Leader of the House of Commons, Lucy Powell, will address the standards committee on limiting such earnings, citing concerns about reputational risks and conflicts of interest.

Current rules prohibit MPs from being paid for advising on parliamentary work, but the proposed changes aim to further curb outside earnings and restore trust in politics.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nogooduser 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Plenty of jobs at less than £90k/year say that you’re not allowed a second job.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Being an MP is an exceptional role, or at least it should be.

[–] 13esq 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Exactly, and a lot of people find it hard to swallow, but we should absolutely want the best and most able people as our MPs, not just the people who were born in to wealth and have nothing better to do.

That means if a great scientists, doctors, business men, engineers etc etc need to be tempted to become MPs rather than take private sectors roles, then they should be. To me this means the salary must be very attractive and I'm fine with this also meaning "no second jobs".

Inb4: "yh, but being an MP has prestige, it's worth more than money!!!".

How many people do you know that do a job for the prestige of it? How many banks accept prestige for their mortgage repayments? Money is the bottom line and if you want more talent and less Jacob Rees Mogg, you have to pay for it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Another aspect that plays into deciding the level of pay for elected officials, is to also reduce the appeal of bribes/corruption. Obviously there should/need to be laws to prevent that as well, but some people will always skirt og break the rules if there is a large enough gain.