this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
769 points (98.1% liked)
People Twitter
5474 readers
1923 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A guy from South Africa made his app anti-black? Shocking.
Does this comment/joke assume all white South Africans are racist?
No. It simply states that it's not surprising when one is.
That's kinda bigoted
you're the guy who said that we can't say the police is a racist organization because there are black cops. I wouldn't be too involved in race conversations if I were you tbh.
I admit that one might have been a bad take in hindsight, but my stance is unshakeable on this issue
It’s bigoted to invade a county and extort them for labor because you believe the native population to be inferior.
I know. It is also bigoted to say you're not surprised by a white South African being racist. That's like saying you're not surprised by a black African American being a criminal.
No it fucking isn't
Yes it is. You're making a judgement about both groups based on the colour of their skin
If it makes you feel any better, I'm pre-judging Musk based on his bank account.
Then it's more like imperialist white South Africans, so judge away.
Wow ..no you're not. Jesus, where did you learn logic???
Since you're so knowledgeable about logic Mr. Philosophy, why don't you go ahead and tell me what is wrong with my comparison.
Also, you're lucky I'm not blasting you for that atrocious punctuation
The logical error here is assuming it's about skin colour when it's in fact about centuries of exploitation in Africa that Musk benefited hugely from. I suppose it's not a logical error if one doesn't know about the history of colonialism in Africa.
It's reasonable to assume that any white person who lived in southern Africa (Namibia, Botswana, Zambia, Zimbabwe, South Africa in particular) moved there not for the safari or the lifestyle but for the eye-watering profits that came from exploiting the land as their resource and its peoples as their labour. A lot of contrarian arguments that get voted down on the internet focus on the minority view, and I think this is where you're coming from - unfortunately in the case of colonial Africa, there aren't very many clean hands at all, even if they weren't the ones being cut off.
I don't think it's a logical error to assume it's about race when the original comment did not specify otherwise.
Edit: It was also further confirmed by the commenter LowestStone that they themselves at least were looking at the race angle.
I understand your point about colonialism well and the fact that many white people who went to South Africa went there for the profits of human exploitation, but is this historical background enough to conclude that it is expected of a white South African to be racist? That's the problem i have with the initial comment i responded to. It doesn't differ much from reverse racism to me.
There seems to be a culture of hating one's own race in order to make up for colonialism and racism among white people. This is simply not necessary.
Oh no. White people being the target of bigotry? Welcome to the fucking club that they started.
Just calling out the double standard man. We don't have to continue a bad practice.
Sir, you are bringing logic to a Lemmy thread where only emotion matters. It doesn't seem to be going well for you frankly.
I don't know why i still bother honestly; only to be labelled a fascist/Nazi once they're done with the downvote bombing. It's disgusting.