this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
174 points (99.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7671 readers
420 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jury nullification is the term for when a jury declines to convict a defendant despite overwhelming evidence of guilt. This can be a form of civil disobedience, a political statement against a specific law, or a show of empathy and support to the defendant.

“It’s not a legal defense sanctioned under the law,” said Cheryl Bader, associate professor of law at Fordham School of Law. “It’s a reaction by the jury to a legal result that they feel would be so unjust or morally wrong that they refuse to impose it, despite what the law says.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Never thought I’d see a mainstream outlet discussing this. There’s less plausible deniability for potential jurors now

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They can't dismiss all the jury candidates...

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Welcome to the United States of America, where the justice system is a cruel and unusual joke and only for the working class.

[–] EmpathicVagrant 5 points 1 month ago

Soon it’ll just be twelve AI models

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I am confident some evidence will be debatable. It's quite possible that jurors can honestly say they aren't convinced beyond a reasonable doubt. The arrest alone is bizarre, and the trial will bring all sorts of things.