this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
7 points (100.0% liked)
Anarchism
376 readers
1 users here now
Are you an Anarchist? The answer might surprise you!
Rules:
- Be respectful
- Don't be a nazi
- Argue about the point and not the person
- This is not the place to debate the merits of anarchism itself. While discussion is encouraged, getting in your “epic dunks on the anarkiddies” is not. As a result of the instance’s poor moderation policies and hostility toward anarchists by default, lemmygrad users are encouraged not to post here, though not explicitly disallowed if they aren’t just looking to start a fight.
See also:
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Uhm, at best there was a liberal phase between 2011 and 2023, which was not "left" in any shape or form. But even that is not true for most of Europe, which was already in the hands of right leaning conservatives all this time and arguably what counts as "liberal" in the US would be considered center-right in Europe as well.
Sure, the state has a tendency towards liberalism. But the state and it's parties (such as the US Democrats) aren't a monolith. There are genuine leftists within the democrat party. Whether those had much direct political influence is another story, but nonetheless my point stands that leftists had much momentum and positions within the government.
I don't wish to attack you, but quite frankly it's this totalizing dismissal of political process that is a large part of leftist failure, in my opinion. Leftists being overly quick to judge something or someone as having failed the moral purity test of leftism and then the whole organization is similarly totalized as not really left. Which just in effect leads to any leftist organizing efforts to eat itself in a circle of purity tests. I am european, german to be exact. The governing party was CDU for the longest time with a chancelor that was more left relative to the rest of her party. Then social democrats, greens and liberals joined a coalition and failed spectacularly. Not unsurprisingly due to inter-governmental infighting.
Do you really think a more effective approach is to just 'be more left' when finding consensus within the left seems all but impossible no matter where in the left spectrum one finds themselves in?
If you are German, please don't forget that the nominally leftist SPD was part of the Merkel coalition all this time but has very little to show for it, to the point that people seem to have forgotten they even were part of the government.
My stance isn't that of leftist purity, but rather that there simply was no leftist politics and the nominally leftist parties (starting with the New Labour movement) either did right wing politics themselves or helped right wing parties into power (which obviously includes Merkel, who is anything but a leftist).
What you seem to percieve as a leftist window of opportunity was in reality center right parties doing status quo politics and kicking the can down the road, which unsurprisignly is catching up to them now.
Then who is the left? Twitter Marxists? Anarchist Telegram groups? I'm not trying to be offensive or contrarian, i'm just trying to get at what exactly we're supposed to do. Like I said, at every point in time there were policy decisions to be made that were more left and served an agenda that would serve humanity more than other policy decisions. There were candidates within a party that were more left than others who could have been supported.
This remains true today, i'm principally against defeatism, but it was even more true from 2011-2023. But leftism failed, clearly. We had an opportunity to shift more left, instead we shifted right. The convenient reaction to this fact could be to become conspiratorial and blame liberals who are in lieu with fascists. But the fact is that liberals are simply opportunists. They're not fascists, but they can be bought by fascists. So did we fail to buy the liberals? Is state politics doomed from the start? And if so, then what?
This is what i'm getting at. Blame games are useless.
We have reached a situation which traditional leftists like to call late-stage-capitalism and due to both internal contradictions in our economic model as well as ecological pressure from the increasingly dire climate catastrophe, politicians that are insisting to keep operating within the capitalist logic are forced into a zero sum game even if they are well intended.
Thus what you call a window of opportunity was a mirage, as it is impossible to reform capitalism from within.
Okay, sure. But again, then what? A violent revolution is a method, not a goal. And even then, like I said in response to mydude above. If one starts a war, one should better be prepared to win it. Are we prepared? The fascists are going to go full force in response to any insurrection. Do we have anything in response?
No, I didn't say revolution or war is the only alternative, but for politics to effectively qualify as leftist they need to be anti-capitalist.