this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
89 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19549 readers
3322 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Although the Republican leadership’s proposed rules were largely a copy-paste of the rules for the 118th Congress, there are some changes. One major difference has to do with the procedure for removing the Speaker, which played a key role in the 118th Congress. Previously, any single member of Congress could bring up a resolution to remove the Speaker. Now, nine Republicans have to co-sponsor such a resolution for it to be considered. This strengthens the hand of the Speaker significantly and also undermines the ability of a majority of the House of Representatives to change who is serving as Speaker.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (9 children)

For those too lazy to read:

For compliance with “title IX” in athletics, to define sex based solely on a person’s reproductive biology and genetics at birth (a version passed in 2023)

To take into custody non-citizens who have been charged with theft.

To make sex offenses and domestic violence deportable offenses. (a version passed in 2024)

To make the assault of a law enforcement officer a deportable offense (a version passed in 2023)

To withhold federal funding that goes to “sanctuary cities” to benefit undocumented immigrants (a version passed in 2024)

New criminal and immigration penalties for intentionally fleeing a pursuing Federal officer while operating a motor vehicle (a version passed in 2024)

To prohibit a health care practitioner from failing to exercise the proper degree of care in the case of a child who survives an abortion or attempted abortion (a version passed in 2023)

To sanction the International Criminal Court for issuing an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, or if it investigates, arrests, detains, or prosecutes any American or ally of the United States. (a version passed in 2024)

A likely-bipartisan bill  to fix double-taxation of residents of Taiwan who pay U.S. taxes

To require proof of United States citizenship to register an to vote (a version passed in 2024)

To amend the Controlled Substances Act with respect to the scheduling of fentanyl (a version passed in 2023)

To prohibit a moratorium on the use of hydraulic fracturing (a version passed in 2024)

[–] DevCat 21 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

To require proof of United States citizenship to register an to vote (a version passed in 2024)

This should be fun. How many US citizens can prove they are here legally right now?

[–] kinther 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Probably with a combination of birth certificate, social security number, credit score, or some other identifier like tax records. Just speculating.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

SovCitz are gonna have a blast with this

[–] AA5B 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It seems like we had to prove something to get an ssn - for my kids I think it was just a checkbox on the birth record - we’ll take an ssn to go

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Years ago I lost my wallet with my social security card and license in it.

My birth certificate was somewhere in the house but it had gone missing.

I had one hell of a time getting all that unraveled.

The MVA at the time was able to make an exception, I was able to bring them an overwhelming amount of personal documents and mail, They already have my image in the system.

I was able to use that and other documentation times to get a birth certificate copy, then I was able to use those documents to get a replacement social security card.

With real ID I don't even know what you'd have to go through today to get that taken care of.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's been a long time for most of us, but we did have to provide some proof when we first registered to vote. I believe it was having a social security number, which itself has proof requirements. Most of us got our SSN at birth.

Yes, there are some holes in this, but they are very rare and limited.

As for proving citizenship currently, the eligibility documents for a passport are published. Most people have the supporting docs to get one.

[–] michaelmrose 2 points 2 weeks ago

Your ID proves you were here legally wherein the government has a record of your birth certificate existing even if you don't physically have said certificate on your person.

Now if we want to prove you weren't granted birthright citizenship which is absolutely and totally irrefutably a thing that trump can't legally change by fiat you would have to reference your parents which should again be on the birth cert which again the US in fact does already possess even if you have lost your copy.

load more comments (5 replies)