this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
842 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

60314 readers
2874 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 71 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Saved you a click

Among other accusations, MegaLag said that if a YouTuber or other creator promotes a product through an affiliate link, if the viewer has installed Honey, the extension will surreptitiously substitute its own link when the viewer makes a purchase — even if Honey didn’t provide any discounts. That means Honey, not the creator, receives the affiliate revenue for the transaction.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If they'd just been a little less greedy, and only inserted their affiliate link for purchases where none was originally present, and actually provided the service they advertised rather than 'partnering' with merchants to provide worse coupons, they'd probably never have gotten caught and if they had, nobody would have cared. Could have skimmed a significant but lesser amount forever. But no, they had to go full on villain, and here we are.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Having a pressure point against the shops by letting them control what kind of coupons would be shown was probably a big reason they weren't just kicked out of at least some of those affiliate programmes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's a fair point, but they could have been up front about it, or at least adjusted their advertising some. They basically told consumers "We'll get you the best deal, and if we don't find one, it doesn't exist", which is a spurious claim anyway, but it surely misled people. They could have just said "We'll see if we have any coupon codes available" or something less committal. There still would have been a lot of value for regular consumers... if you weren't using a coupon code, 5% off is better than nothing and if they weren't being dicks about the referral links, nobody likely would have cared in the slightest.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean, yeah, they suck. But honestly, a crowdsourced database of coupons feels like it isn't a good fit for a for-profit company anyway.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Also worth noting that they don't actually find you the best coupons available. They partner with retailers to get an approved list of coupon codes that they will allow. So claims of always finding you the best price are just false.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Saved me a watch too, thanks!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

You left out the part about Honey charging sellers to hide coupons.