this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
150 points (78.8% liked)

Selfhosted

40949 readers
584 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud
Loki
CannaVet
devve
HybridSarcasm
[email protected]
150
Plebbit is a peer-to-peer Reddit alternative that allows you to self host and own your own community (lemmy.world)
submitted 6 days ago by Plebbitor to c/selfhosted
136 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Plebbit is a selfhosted, opensource, nonprofit social media protocol, this project was created due to wanting to give control of communication and data back to the people.

Plebbit only hosts text. Images from google and other sites can be linked/embedded in posts. This fixes the issue of hosting any nefarious content.

it has no central server, database, HTTP endpoint or DNS - it is pure peer to peer. Unlike federated instances, which are regular websites that can get deplatformed at any time,

ENS domain are used to name communities.

Plebbit currently offers different UIs. Old reddit and new reddit, 4chan, and have a Blog. Plebbit intend to have an app, internet archive, wiki and twitter and Lemmy. Choice is important. The backend/communities are shared across clients.

The code is fully open source on

https://github.com/plebbit

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Isn't that effectively the same? I like the lightweight aspect of it though

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

No. From what I can tell, Plebbit works like this:

  1. User A generates public and private key, and registers a name with the DNS/ENS service to link the name to the public key
  2. User A controls the list of moderators, which have the power to delete posts and comments granted by the private key
  3. Other users create posts and comments with that public key, and User A later signs them with the private key to make them "official"

If User A ends the service, moderation and signing of comments end, which effectively kills the community.

My proposal works like this:

  1. users post to a topic (i.e. community)

That's it. Any moderation happens on the client. I have plans to make moderation largely automatic, so it's not a pain while still hopefully controlling spam and trolls. Half the network could go down and the data would still largely be intact. In fact, a country could block internet entirely, and you could still sneakernet it in as long as someone has a relay there. If somehow all relays go down, you spin one up and everyone resyncs and we call it an outage. You can even host your own within your LAN.

Domain names are convenient for relays, but they're not essential. The only thing required is some way to connect peers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Oh, that might just create some legal issues

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

For who?

  • me? I can't delete anything even if I wanted to
  • relay hosts? Most connections are short lived, and any data is end to end encrypted
  • cache maintainers? They can only delete local copies, so there's no reason not to comply; they could even actively filter the data they store
  • individual users? There's plausible deniability, which should protect the innocent, and local moderation should address the worst of it

The biggest targets are individual users, but as we've seen with BitTorrent, that almost never happens. There's also no profit here, so there are no assets to seize, though I'll probably accept donations.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't mean crime, no. There's laws regarding moderation when a platform is big enough. And regarding personal data in a lot of cases

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ah, that's not a thing where I'm from (US). I wonder what that would look like without a central authority. There's no way to guarantee any particular moderation or ensure deletion of personal data, so I guess their options are to ban it or let it slide.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Probably only the instances big enough to qualify