this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
316 points (95.9% liked)

unix_surrealism

1799 readers
139 users here now

one should not chase the electric dream, but strive to became an extension to its dreamer

Automatism in the age of the children of Unix. This community is for all things related to computers, content, surrealism and wizardry.

...

This is also where pmjv posts his work

https://analognowhere.com

...

Now that you're a surrealist, become a Techno-Mage:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nul9o9 33 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Tiling window managers fit this for me.

[–] madthumbs 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The first version of Windows used tiling.

[–] TrickDacy 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Not really. The tiling in windows didn't work in the same automatic "turn it on and watch it go" way that it does on Linux. But don't let that get in the way of your bizarre Linux trolling as I know you've been waiting all day for your moment to "shine"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I used Windows 2.something on an old Compaq 386 (16MHz) and it didn't automatically title anything. There was an option to tile (or cascade) the current window set, but a new window would not cause a retiling. Neither would a window closing.

[–] madthumbs 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Windows 1; not 2

-Because of a lawsuit from Apple.

Fwiw, I've seen some people demonstrate a robust and efficient keyboard based workflow using floating window management. Sometimes it's a simple matter of what you set out to learn.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah, I prefer tiled windows (XMonad) but I use my mouse for a lot of things, it's not because I need a keyboard based workflow.