this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
55 points (82.4% liked)

Games

32970 readers
1948 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
quinten
shitpostpolice
Dremor
[email protected]
55
Would "suggest price" be a positive option for steam? (lemmy.giftedmc.com)
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/games
42 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I just looked at a game that is 60€ and said "I dont think its worth that and would buy now for 30, just to check it out". Then I had the idea that some publishers/devs might benefit from knowing that 1-100000 people think that the game is worth X and would buy now for that price right now. In a case like today, the additional revenue would help their financial report etc. They could make short discounts to get especially these customers or even more tailored, you need to press "buy" and confirm at that price to let the publisher know. Like suggest price on ebay.

Let me know your thoughts and if this is a terrible idea. :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 80 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This assumes people are rational and that what they say they are willing to pay matches what they are actually willing to pay. And that is just the people not trying to abuse the system.

[–] XeroxCool 10 points 1 day ago

I'm guilty of this. So many times, I'll see something at full price and say I'll wait to buy it on sale. Then it goes on sale and I don't feel like spending the money at all. Granted, I'm not trying to sway the market and screaming my bid, this is just my internal monologue. I have a backlog of games and a busy adult life, so it's not like I'm game-poor. Just regular poor.

[–] Dran_Arcana 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Personally I don't think I'd advocate for OP's suggestion, but you could solve the problem by making the suggestion also a commitment for X period of time. If you make the suggestion, and the price drops within 90 days, it automatically purchases it, etc.

[–] JASN_DE 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

And what'd you get? People putting in 0.10. Unfortunately useless, as the poster above said.

[–] Mitchie151 14 points 2 days ago

You can put in a buy order at 0.1 for a share worth 100. You're dreaming, but you can still do it. Don't think it really qualifies as abusing the system.

[–] Dran_Arcana 3 points 2 days ago

potential solution: minimum commitment 10% of original list price?