this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
369 points (96.7% liked)

Chronic Illness

313 readers
1 users here now

A community/support group for chronically ill people. While anyone is welcome, our number one priority is keeping this a safe space for chronically ill people.

This is a support group, not a place for people to spout their opinions on disability.

Rules

  1. Be excellent to each other

  2. Absolutely no ableism. This includes harmful stereotypes: lazy/freeloaders etc

  3. No quackery. Does an up-to date major review in a big journal or a major government guideline come to the conclusion you’re claiming is fact? No? Then don’t claim it’s fact. This applies to potential treatments and disease mechanisms.

  4. No denialism or minimisation This applies challenges faced by chronically ill people.

  5. No psychosomatising psychosomatisation is a tool used by insurance companies and governments to blame physical illnesses on mental problems, and thereby saving money by not paying benefits. There is no concrete proof psychosomatic or functional disease exists with the vast majority of historical diagnoses turning out to be biomedical illnesses medicine has not discovered yet. Psychosomatics is rooted in misogyny, and consisted up until very recently of blaming women’s health complaints on “hysteria”.

Did your post/comment get removed? Before arguing with moderators consider that the goal of this community is to provide a safe space for people suffering from chronic illness. Moderation may be heavy handed at times. If you don’t like that, find or create another community that prioritises something else.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

[off topic]

Great old movie, "The Fortune Cookie."

A crooked lawyer and his patsy are trying to get a giant settlement. The insurance company calls in an expert to prove the dupe isn't injured.

[Heavy German accent.] "Bah! In the old days we didn't bother with tests. If someone said he couldn't walk we threw him in the snake pit. If he climbed out we knew he was lying."

"What if he couldn't get out?"

"He'd die. But we knew he was honest."

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

That sums up the current system except instead of “knowing he was honest” after death, they would blame the death on “mental health issues” or whatever it takes to ignore the systemic issue that led to it.

[–] perviouslyiner 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Doesn't sound too dissimilar to some stories coming out of the DWP here - for example, assessment centres being at the top of stairs. If you manage to get there, denied for being able to climb stairs, if you don't, denied for missing the appointment.

[–] Tehdastehdas 2 points 1 month ago

"If you can climb stairs for 5 minutes, you can obviously work 40 hours a week."