THE POLICE PROBLEM
The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.
99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.
When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.
When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."
When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.
Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.
The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.
All this is a path to a police state.
In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.
Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.
That's the solution.
♦ ♦ ♦
Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.
♦ ♦ ♦
RULES
① Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.
② If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.
③ Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.
④ Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.
Please also abide by the instance rules.
It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.
♦ ♦ ♦
ALLIES
• r/ACAB
♦ ♦ ♦
INFO
• A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions
• Cops aren't supposed to be smart
• Killings by law enforcement in Canada
• Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom
• Killings by law enforcement in the United States
• Know your rights: Filming the police
• Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)
• Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.
• Police lie under oath, a lot
• Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak
• Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street
• Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States
• When the police knock on your door
♦ ♦ ♦
ORGANIZATIONS
• NAACP
• National Police Accountability Project
• Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration
view the rest of the comments
That's really going to put a dent in the police retirement fund isn- wait what? Did you say taxpayers?
If the taxpayer didn't want this to happen then he should have written in 'No more police chases' on his ballot back in November, but he chose not to.
Whose ballot was that? Trump won, so you don't refer to him. Democrats are in power now, so I guess it's not them either.
If the taxpayer didn't want this to happen then **he should have **written in 'No more police chases' **on his ballot **back in November, but he chose not to.
You fucking doorknob
Is that wish granting ballot box at the end of a yellow brick road? If so you might want to ask for a brain.
You... Table leg? Yeah, I'll go with that.
Sorry if English isn't your first language, because you seem to be missing the point "he" from OP was referring to the hypothetical voter several words before that, not the inanimate ballot or recepticol for it, or a particular candidate... but you seem to be getting more offended and triggered by my response pointing this out which is more likely my original comment regarding your comprehension
Not offended. Your comment was so stupid (I don't recall anybody using "doorknob" outside of comedy in a long while) I thought you were just joking. I guess you are only trying to troll and don't like I'm not getting down to your level, which is a bit sad I guess.
Here I was thinking you were trolling and the other guy was feeding you. There might be other trolling or sarcasm goimg on but I wouldn't know anything about that.
Nope, he still doesn't understand the point made, at all. Reading comprehension is harder than shit posting.
The doorknob comment was impulsive because a doorknob doesn't do much until it's manipulated, normally by a right hand.