this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
444 points (97.0% liked)

World News

39327 readers
1679 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Former Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba warned that if Ukraine falls to Russia, the conflict could spread to European cities, as Putin might target the EU next.

Kuleba emphasized Ukraine's NATO membership as critical to preventing future wars, dismissing security guarantees as insufficient.

He criticized potential peace settlements at Ukraine’s territorial expense, stressing the need for Moscow to negotiate in good faith.

Amid escalating attacks on Ukraine, Kuleba defended counter-escalation using U.S.-supplied weapons, while Trump criticized Biden’s support for strikes inside Russia.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Against the US? No. Unequivocally not happening, no.

Solo EU vs. solo US would lead to a stalemate, both sides quickly realising that the other party is on the other side of the Atlantic and that noone has a counter against stealth subs, which the US would be able to develop before the EU has time to build a non-negligible amount of aircraft carriers. Nukes won't be an issue both sides have enough second-strike capabilities to turn the other side to glass, unless the US gets a foothold in France at which point the French would first strike. So don't do that, especially when the stalemate is so comfortably an ocean wide.

Pick three EU nations at random and their combined might would exceed Russia’s with only moderate effort.

Luxembourg, Malta, Cyprus.

...I mean generally speaking you're right but technically no.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I said “at random” for a reason. The likelihood of choosing all three of the least preparable nations is 1/1000. I don’t believe you chose randomly, and therefore would like to indicate that your mother is a hamster and your father smells of elderberries.

[–] Maalus 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And your father smells even more of elderberries in the morning than the evening

[–] Maalus 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ye cool. The point is you think a random function will choose Germany, France, Spain, Poland or Italy. When there is 27 countries in the EU, most of them utterly unprepared for war.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

Continued notification game eh? Take the 1

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But I could have chosen randomly, your post might be read by a billion people each rolling their own set of independent dice, and that's why you don't leave engineering to theorists.

...and it's the three least populous nations, btw. Together about 2m people. About the average of Lithuania and Slovenia, a bit more than a tenth of Romania, or about 0.45% of the whole of the EU.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago

Truthfully, I realized all of this, including the specific countries someone might choose, and giggled at my coming retort as I wrote the comment. Get baited, nerd.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Europe has many stealth subs, I mean scary stealth, like pop up undetected in the middle of a US carrier group and "sink" a US carrier stealthy, several aircraft carriers, and four or five of the world's top 10 arms exporter countries.

Missiles, Eurofighters, Rafales, Gripens, F35s, nukes, last gen frigates and destroyers...

Overwhelmingly superior in tech, generation, and number to what Russia has and Ukraine is being given. Also a tech and and manufacturing might vastly superior. Ukraine is not Nato. Even without the US, Europe would wipe the floor with Russia, and Putin knows.

That said, if combined with the US would really make it a special operation.

Also remeber that the USSR was able to defeat Hitler because of Allied material, especially US through Lend-lease.