this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
30 points (96.9% liked)

Selfhosted

40693 readers
790 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud
Loki
CannaVet
devve
HybridSarcasm
[email protected]
30
[HELP] Migrating away from Android Password Store (self.selfhosted)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by ReginaPhalange to c/selfhosted
24 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Looking to migrate away from APS as it is no longer in active development.
I need a solution that will still enable me to add/remove/change passwords from an Android device, a Linux device, and have all changes sync-up. (In GNU-pass-based APS, it's achieved by a git repo that saves passwords as gpg encrypted files) Preferably, I want it to still be self hosted, F-Droidable, and maybe a migration guide or tool to ease the transition.

Thanks!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] just_another_person 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

Bitwarden for paid, or VaultWarden for self-hosted.

I would say throw them some support and buy the cheap yearly pricing. It's a steal, and you won't have to worry about it ever.

[–] keyez -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Or best of both worlds, self host Bitwarden directly for $20/year

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't get it

[–] just_another_person 4 points 1 week ago

Me either

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wut?

[–] keyez -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well yes, I run my own, as does everyone else questioning your response. The $20 is throwing everyone without context. We can only assume you mean hosting costs.

[–] keyez 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I was responding to a comment about bitwarden being paid while vaultwarden is self hosted. I've been self hosting bitwarden for years and pay $20 a year for the subscription to do so and support them. Is the self hosted option not paid like the comment I replied to says?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

OK, there's the context. "I self-host BitWarden and pay for an individual license to get extra features and support them."

All for that: Finance FOSS! That bring said, Comment OP didn't say you couldn't self-host BitWarden, but I understand the response now. Vaultwarden is just so much easier to self-host, though.

[–] keyez 1 points 6 days ago

The way it is written was like only vault warden is self host able and usually VW is mentioned more in forums when the actual official stack that gets regular updates and security reviews is available to host so I always like to point that out so more people use it instead of the knock off though it does have it's use cases.

load more comments (7 replies)