this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
325 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59982 readers
4137 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
325
LG stops making Blu-ray players, marking the end of an era — limited units remain while inventory lasts (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/technology
95 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Digital streaming is displacing the last remnants of physical media.

In a disappointing turn of events, FlatpanelsHD reports that LG has ended production of its Blu-ray player series, which includes the UBK80 and UBK90 models. With limited stock available, prospective buyers should act quickly to secure the last remaining units before they are sold out.

After Samsung and Sony's departure from physical media, LG was one of the last major manufacturers of Blu-ray players

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You can own DRMless media instead. BluRay was already more restrictive than DVD, from what I understand.

[–] ch00f 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Eh. A few more steps to rip the content, but not bad really.

Now UHD Blu-ray is a different story. There are a limited number of drives that could do it before their firmware was patched.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I find buying DVDs just to rip the contents impractical anyway. If I were concerned with ethics - I'd likely do like I do with Steam games and buy a DRMed version corresponding to my DRMless download. Because I'd rather not deal with a disk taking up space or needing to be disposed of, not to mention potential scarcity if it is no longer in print.

Agree on Blu-Ray. Also, weren't there region restrictions?

[–] ch00f 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, it is frustrating that the license is tied to the physical disc. Especially when they won't send you a replacement for a damaged disc.

I personally buy, rip, and keep the physical discs of my collection which is now well over 1,000 titles. It's a lot of work, and takes up a lot of space, but it's also a hobby I enjoy. I'd much prefer if I could just buy a license for the film and watch it or store it however I want.

You know, this might actually be a decent application for NFTs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

I wouldn't want that, NFTs are wasteful and also very much public.

I see the value in disks if you're into collecting the physical pieces, but if you're not into that, I don't find it a good way to own - for me that would be useless pieces of plastic occupying space. Very much not for everyone.

[–] daggermoon 4 points 5 days ago

Ripping them is actually really easy if you have a compatible drive.