this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
70 points (88.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8724 readers
1080 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
70
Intel researchers create a method for AI-generating frames in games without added input latency (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The reprojected frame with the ball in the same spot is still more up to date than a generated frame using interpolation.

With reprojection, every other frame is showing where the ball actually is.

It essential displays the game-world at the framerate it is actually being generated, with as little latency as possible.

I vastly prefer this. Together with the reduced perceived input latency, this makes motion tracking FAR easier than with frame generation.

With current frame generation, every frame, is showing where the ball was, two or three frames ago. You never see where it is right now. Due to this, in fast paced action, hand-eye coordination is slower, more likely to overshoot, etc.

And further developed reprojection, absolutely could account for such things.