this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
31 points (91.9% liked)
Cars - For Car Enthusiasts
3969 readers
32 users here now
About Community
c/Cars is the largest automotive enthusiast community on Lemmy and the fediverse. We're your central hub for vehicle-related discussion, industry news, reviews, projects, DIY guides, advice, stories, and more.
Rules
- Stay respectful to the community, hold civil discussions, even when others hold opinions that may differ from yours.
- This is not an NSFW community, and any such content will not be tolerated.
- Policy, not politics! Policy discussions revolve around the concept; political discussions revolve around the individual, party, association, etc. We only allow POLICY discussions and political discussions should go to c/politics.
- Must be related to cars, anything that does not have connection to cars will be considered spam/irrelevant and is subject to removal.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Okay, so you want me to remove 0.25 miles from my 530 mile tank?
And you think that meaningfully changes the calculations... why? But sure, its a 529.75 mile gas tank (1/4th a mile out of my way between my work and house), for a difference of 0.05% less efficiency on the gasoline engine.
Any other effects you want me to throw on here? Or are you splitting hairs? But I think ~30% losses from the advertised ranges in the 30F / -1C temperatures for EVs is the main problem here that people probably should know about. And honestly, I'm not sure if 0.05% losses due to trips to the gas station are... relevant.
I've ignored the wire-loss (1.5% losses) in my house btw for the above calculations. But I have the ability to measure the 120V to 118V loss thanks to Kill-a-Watt. I bring this up because my coworker was getting 8V of loss (aka: 6% losses) when he was charging his Tesla. So wire losses might be substantial and the reader should be aware of how to actually measure wire losses.
Hey man, I'm just trying to make you more accurate. No need to get all fussy about it.
Dude genuinely sees flying off the handle as the right way of responding to disagreement. He explains that people who criticise him are iredeemably dishonest so debating them is a waste of time and he finds it ends the discussion much quicker if he puts a lot of anger and insults in.
Straight up!
https://lemmy.world/comment/13878703
I'll paste it on case he deletes it.
He lives by the anger and insults advice, I can attest, but in terms of ending the discussion, and moving on with his life, he's not so good at that part. I believe him when he claims to refuse to do any balancing tests, but not for the reasons he claims, he just doesn't want to know about data that paints a different picture.
I'm just trying to point out that you made an irrelevant comment. No need to get fussy about it. Maybe think a bit before posting next time, lol.
Not all factoids are relevant to a discussion. Especially the things that are only fractions of a percent difference.