this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
31 points (91.9% liked)
Cars - For Car Enthusiasts
3969 readers
31 users here now
About Community
c/Cars is the largest automotive enthusiast community on Lemmy and the fediverse. We're your central hub for vehicle-related discussion, industry news, reviews, projects, DIY guides, advice, stories, and more.
Rules
- Stay respectful to the community, hold civil discussions, even when others hold opinions that may differ from yours.
- This is not an NSFW community, and any such content will not be tolerated.
- Policy, not politics! Policy discussions revolve around the concept; political discussions revolve around the individual, party, association, etc. We only allow POLICY discussions and political discussions should go to c/politics.
- Must be related to cars, anything that does not have connection to cars will be considered spam/irrelevant and is subject to removal.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I just did some napkin math using Google research numbers. On average L2 charging appears to be 7.3% more efficient than L1. (83.8% efficient for L1, 89.4 for 2.. and the percentage increase is not subtraction problem for anyone wanting to poke at my math).
So using your electricity-only efficiency numbers, you would still only get: 12.5 * 1.073 = 13.41 miles/dollar.
It's partially subtraction.
The 100W heater (or whatever it is....) to condition the battery in the winter is a subtraction problem, not a multiplication problem. The heater needs to run during the winter when charging or when driving.
1100W L1 charger - 100W heater is less efficient than 3500W to 10,000W L2 charger - 100W heater.
Now there is another component of multiplicative losses (the inductor and/or voltage conversion coil + MOSFET switch resistance). So it's partially subtraction and partially multiplicative losses. Ultimately I'll need to just test the damn thing to find reality, we can't math this out on paper. (100W losses I assumed earlier was just that, an assumption. I have no idea how much the battery conditioning circuits / pumps / etc. uses up in practice)
The real problem is that I'm not aware of any Kill-a-watt model for 240V circuits. I'll have to rely upon the charger to give me accurate readouts. But all the theory (and apparently some internet testing) suggests that the
You can look into a current clamp meter as a stand in for the kill-a-watt. If you're willing to tinker a bit and like automation, you can use one of those and an esp32 board to make a remote power monitoring system for your 240v circuit.
If you're less willing to tinker you can get some off the shelf stuff that you run the wires through or a clamp style variant to do something similar.
(Note: I can't provide any recommendations on off the shelf products, I just bought the clamps and am working on tinkering it together).
Hmmm, current is the bulk of it. But voltage drop is also important as that'd measure wire losses. (All wires have resistance and it adds up the longer the wire runs get).
But yeah, good idea. I'm actually into electrical engineering so ESP32 is right up my alley. I mean, I prefer AVR but any uC can be used in that circumstance.