this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
611 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

60058 readers
2853 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Etterra 5 points 2 weeks ago (22 children)

Good riddance, vertical videos are cancer, short form obliterates attention spans, and their algorithm is engineered specifically to addict people, especially kids.

Now to ban all the rest of them. Let's start with Facebook. Twitter is already killing itself but could stand to be "helped" off the cliff.

[–] nek0d3r 30 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

These bans are bad. All it takes is for the US to think the fediverse is a threat and this goes too. You clearly don't like the platform and that's okay, but don't root for government censorship on the internet.

[–] Dozzi92 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm all for Australia style banning to kids, however that gets implemented, but this is slippery slope and all that. But hey, maybe not, maybe it's the only time they do it.

[–] nek0d3r 4 points 2 weeks ago

Wouldn't that be nice, if the powers that be didn't grab for more power lol

[–] JcbAzPx 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The only reason this is bannable is that it is owned by china essentially; based on national security grounds. As long as the fediverse is never sold to an enemy nation, there's nothing to worry about.

[–] nek0d3r 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The US has control of US tiktok servers. This is bannable because politicians want the power to control social media.

[–] JcbAzPx -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not true. That's why the banning has a clause allowing for the sale of the US portion to a US (or other allied) company.

[–] nek0d3r 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/17/tech/tiktok-user-data-oracle/index.html Definitely, definitely correct. A company that's owned by a foreign nation shouldn't be a problem. And if you think that this doesn't set a precedent for banning anything politicians don't like, then I feel sorry for your naivety.

[–] JcbAzPx -5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's no national security basis to ban social media from the US or a friendly country. It would be protected by the first amendment otherwise. They have actual evidence that China was using TikTok as electronic warfare, which is the only reason they can ban it.

[–] nek0d3r 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm baffled by your blind faith in politicians. There's been clear foreign influence on just about every major social media platform.

[–] JcbAzPx -2 points 2 weeks ago

It's odd you seem to have more faith in China than in the US. Personally, while my trust in my country is low, it is infinitely higher than my trust in China.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Sounds very much like you're telling me that if I have nothing to hide, I have nothing to fear.

load more comments (19 replies)