this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
609 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59882 readers
5141 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I really don't think China is nearly as interested in siphoning data as controlling the algorithm. Getting people to see more pro-Chinese videos, more anti-US videos, and some bias toward candidates they want to see win is completely doable without exfiltrating any data.

Basically, all the stuff people are pissed about Musk doing to Twitter (changing algo to push right wing content) are just as feasible for TikTok to do, with the main difference being China is a state actor, whereas Musk is a private billionaire.

We should be very worried about any social media app that's very popular and controlled by an org with political motivations.

[–] Maggoty 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean sure, if you can find any evidence they're actually doing that. We have the best intelligence agencies in the world, both domestic and foreign facing. So where's the meat?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, there's a law to block it, and our intelligence agencies are pretty secretive, so there's a good chance the proof exists.

I'm against banning it, not because I don't think China is manipulating the algorithm (they probably are), but because I believe banning it is a violation of the 1st amendment. I refuse to use it, but I also refuse to ban others from using it.

[–] Maggoty 3 points 4 days ago

That's the problem though. Under that reasoning they can shut down any social media app. There's specifically a catch all in the definition to do this so they don't have to pass another law.