this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
67 points (98.6% liked)
Linux Gaming
15493 readers
444 users here now
Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME
away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.
This page can be subscribed to via RSS.
Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.
Resources
WWW:
Discord:
IRC:
Matrix:
Telegram:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
TIL people still burn their isos... Just use an USB stick. lol
Read closely and you'll notice they used a thumb drive.
People usually refer to the act of copying the data directly onto the device as something other than "copying" to differentiate from copying the ISO as a file to a filesystem on the drive.
I'm honestly okay with the term "burn" being used here. It's not correct, but it's the same general operation. I usually say I'm "dd-ing an image onto the USB," but that's because I'm a Linux nerd and use
dd
for this.This is also one of those weird things: Why do people use
dd
for this?It doesn't do anything special, it just does a plain old
read()
/write()
loop on regular-ass UNIX files. Its actual purpose is to do character set conversions while doing so.You can just
cp image.iso /dev/sda
or evencat image.iso > /dev/sda
. (The latter only works in a privileged shell because it's the shell whichopen()
s the device file.)Idk about
cp
, but I can set block size and whatnot indd
, which seems to get better write performance. But maybe that's a non-issue these days.Ya basically. Anytime I'm applying x to y hardware I'll use "burn" or "flash" interchangeably. Something to indicate it's overriding what's there rather than just a fs cp.