Map Enthusiasts

3580 readers

481 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

post relevant content: interesting, informative, and/or pretty maps
be nice

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

330

Lake depths and heights (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is a map enthusiast community, not a lying with statistics and graphic design community.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Then go yell at OP about posting a non-map.

There's no lie here, nobody thought lakes are actually finger-shaped in cross-section.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Strawman arguments aside, it seems you've already forgotten how this comment chain started. Just let it go.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You're the one being randomly aggressive in an otherwise-friendly conversation.

I had forgotten the cross-sections were already mentioned, that's true. I mentally boiled down what you wrote to "not to scale means inconsistent scale". My point was that if there isn't any inconsistency in vertical scale - which is what I suspect - there's no "lie".