this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
884 points (99.6% liked)

Science Memes

11399 readers
318 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
884
conditional probability (mander.xyz)
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
72 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Attempts to dodge the question make it clear that you cannot articulate any harm here. Which is one of the things that makes it not bigotry. Go touch grass mate.

[–] Anticorp 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I shouldn't need to articulate why its harmful to insult people based on attributes they were born with. Sex and gender are protected classes under the laws of almost every developed nation. Bigotry is harmful, even if you think that the group you're being bigoted towards has some perceived advantage. Arbitrarily stereotyping 50% of the earth's population is foolish and closed-minded.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

We’re not even talking about insulting people. We’re talking about humor that points out the very real fact that men are by a huge margin the main perpetrators of violence against women (and against men too!)

Again, how is that harmful?

[–] Anticorp 3 points 1 week ago

You've moved the goalposts. Originally you said that it was okay because the targeted group is privileged, and now you're saying it's okay because they're the majority demographic for a specific crime. My response is the same either way though. It's wrong because it perpetuates harmful stereotypes against an entire group of people, rather than treating them as individuals like everyone deserves to be treated. Harmful stereotypes influence everything from common perception, all the way up to things like custodial preference in custody cases between two parents, regardless of the qualifications or behavior of the parents, or spousal abuse when the victim is a male. Substitute "men" for any other group and see how your majority demographic argument feels.