Research results on reverse engineering of the LoRa protocol and an implementation in GNU Radio. An open source LoRa PHY layer project provides access to the LoRa protocol for researchers and hobbyists.
this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
47 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
59776 readers
4692 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah, I get that, but my points still stand.
As you can read from the code, LoRa is many frequencies, and software is not the most efficient way to deal with them. Hell, the chips now even take a ton of power in comparison to BLE or WiFi.
Yes, SDR is less efficient than a specially designed radio chip, but what you gain is flexibility. With SDR, your radio can use any transmission encoding, you are mainly just limited by your polling rate.
Specially designed radio chips thrive in constrained, high-volume manufactured devices. However, for development purposes, being able to use LoRa with an SDR is an amazing step up.
Maybe you ought to look more into what GNU Radio/SDR is capable of before defending this hill you're standing on.
It's certainly not capable of flashing in one step to a chip already on board. That's the hill you're trying to climb.
GNU projects often are sucky. Implementations of things that already exist as they happen upon them and after their uptake. Then people like you come in and defend them. 95% of the time they fail because the existing solution works fine.
I couldn't spare an extra thought about using the GNU brand over another FOSS solution. Anyone in here stomping their feet about this is an absolute moron.
I am quite familiar with Lora hardware, I'm currently running 8 mesh devices. I've done the remote flashing, I've also had remote flashing disable devices and needed to reflash over USB.
This is a completely different use case.
Also, GNU ...brand?